Trump Dumps Misinformation on Voters, Haiti Cleans It Up

Voting can amplify public opinion, but it also risks spreading misinformation, leading to poor decision-making. Without reliable resources for fact-checking, individuals may fall into an "echo chamber" filled with unfounded claims.  

For example, during the debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, former President Donald Trump made inflammatory remarks about legal Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio. Trump stated, “They’re eating the dogs. They’re eating the cats. They’re eating the pets of the people that live there." The highlighting of a marginalized group during an electoral race is deeply problematic.  After these remarks were made it later came out that Trump’s allegations were false. The city of Springfield and Erika Lee, the person responsible for the rumor, clarified that there are no reports of such events happening.

Regulating falsehoods is no small task, especially during election seasons when misinformation spreads rapidly. However, in a nation like the United States– which prides itself on the value of free speech—there should be concern for the integrity of information. Trump is not the only reason to blame for misinformation. Communities should want to learn from leaders, but most of all do research to help fix the problem.  

People usually hold themselves accountable when sharing or defending information. An example of this accountability happened during the night of the Presidential debate when the moderator stated to Trump his political points need to be factual to present to the debate. Edgard Leblanc Fils, leader of the nine-member presidential council of Haiti, shared sentiments towards Haitians’ & Haitian Americans in Springfield, Ohio. After mentioning his solidarity as a country, Fils passionately defended non-citizens and Haitian migrants who have faced xenophobia and racism. Trump's comments disrespect these communities and mock their cultures. 

The issue with misinformation is that it fuels deeper divisions and sows' distrust among voters.  Leaders are obligated to be truthful and well-educated on the information they share. However voters should verify the accuracy of all information consumed. Similar to Fils, showing any sort of support to marginalized communities leads to comradery but most of all an urge for ethical information. Misinformation should not be the kryptonite to the community's choice.